<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Forum]]></title>
	<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Forum]]></description>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Rise of the Planet of the Apes]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=5446132</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This film introduces the concept of attachment as something that makes life sacred. In bioethics decisions relating to end of life and palliative care have to decide whether a life is worthy of saving. There are a number of theories on what makes life sacred and these are predominantly theories that don't invoke divine creation or ensoulment. Conscious, rational decision making is another candidate for what makes human life sacred above other life forms. This argument is double edged because the implication is that a foetus just a few days old is a bunch of cells which is not conscious or rational and hence not life in the sacred sense. <br><br>The second issue the film brings out is ethics of somatic and germ line therapies. Germ line therapy involves modifying sperm or the egg so chat changes are heritable. Somatic therapy modifies the somatic cells of a patient and is not heritable. In the film, convention is thrown out of the window and a somatic therapy is passed to a sibling. <br>The film raise the dangers of germ line therapies as they can change mankind as a whole and this can be devastating if changes are found to be for the worse. The other side of the argument is that it can be used to eradicate genetically transmitted ailments. <br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=5446132</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Ubber Hate Gang]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4869228</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Another gem from the Fringe, blurring the lines between theatre and reality. We are reassured by the actors that having bought tickets, we have willingly chosen to be part of this terrorist event. <BR>As the play unfolds we find out the characters are all driven by a hurt very different from the purported cause. It reminded me of my social psychology experimentation. There truly are lies dammed lies and statistics. On face value religion can appear to be the catalyst, but looking beneath the surface, there are more global factors that drive conflict. <BR>Watching Ubber Hate Gang reach a furious crescendo, I saw religious militancy in their anger, but there was also oppression and self delusion, these, I feel were the ultimate driving force behind their hatred of the world. <BR> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4869228</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4091505</link>
		<description><![CDATA[While some will argue that it separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom, others tell us it is no more than random neuronal firing brought about by environmental stimuli and evolutionary brain wiring.<br>I the qualia we experience as humans something irreducible or is it just an illusion? Is there autonomous self or not?<br><br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21268">Your Views</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=4091505</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[What Changed?]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3651971</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,<BR>Been reading the old testament (bout half way thru)- there's been a lot of concubines and multi-wife stuff going on....biblically when did it change?<BR>The new testament talks about elders having one wife, but biblically whats the case for a one wife policy...don't get me wrong I'm not saying multi-wife/concubines are okay, but is it purely a cultural thing and if so could that apply to other matters. Be interested to hear any thoughts/insight......<BR> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21420">Your Questions</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3651971</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Orphan]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3624332</link>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something deeply unsettling and disturbing about seing evil disguised as pretty and innocent. Orphan shows the destruction caused when it goes unchecked. If you don't like horror you will not like this, it is tense, jumpy and just plain disturbing. <br>It highlights the fact that if we are to have a regenrated and healed world. we need evil to be identified and judged. Judgement is the act of a loving not vindictive God, essential if we are to see healing and regeneration. <br>I am not a believer in Hell in the sense it is taught in evangelical circles, but i do wonder........ there will be a need for god to make sin as powerless. Will there have to be some exclusion for those who refuse to let go of sin?<br><br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3624332</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:49:01 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Gran Torino]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3554838</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Again&nbsp; this could be many films as this is a very popular theme. Clint Eastwood plays an aging bigot who ends up in the &nbsp;middle of gang rivalry. <BR>Having built a rapport with his previously despised neighbors, he decides that the only way the bring an end to the hurt is to surrender his own life. <BR><BR>I like this take on atonement and think it more truly reflects God incarnate in Jesus to a greater extent than our vengeful God who demands the blood of his son the satisfy his wrath. <BR><BR>But atonement is anther concept&nbsp;ingrained in our psyche across cultures. <BR> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3554838</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Chicken Run]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3554833</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This could apply to many animations which all seem to have a substitutional attonement theme or a question about whether there is something greater in the universe that is currently closed off from our sensory experience. ]<br><br>Mel Gibson playing (?????) asks the question. 'Have you ever thought there may be more to life than this living in this chicken run waiting to be made in pies.' <br><br>It's a question that is in all of our psyche. Some will argue that it is just a survival mechanism to protect our minds form the&nbsp;constant fear of agfeing and death. <br>Others would argue that all&nbsp;knowledge comes from us experiencing and percieving the world around&nbsp;us and these senses of the 'wholly other' are valid experiences. &nbsp;<br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3554833</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Second Hand Religion]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3515766</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a&nbsp;phrase coined by William James to describe dutiful followers of any formal religious system. James looked at the experiential aspect of religious experience, arguing that the Bible must be a book chronicling the experiences of the authors. All knowledge is situated and constructed by people living and interacting in the world. James felt we needed to view the Bible as this and accept it as revelation, but revelation given to fallible imperfect human beings. James also believes that experience and revelation is just as valid and important in the life of believers today. <br>This kind&nbsp;of parallels a central belief in Christianity that somewhat gets hidden by dogma, that personal relationship (that must go beyond a simple sinners prayer) is&nbsp;central to&nbsp;faith. &nbsp;<br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21420">Your Questions</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3515766</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Shack]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3062707</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I am reading this very Quickly, such a sad book. Anyone else reading it?<br><br><br>Have decided that this book is worth of reading. Very challenging, but a bit baffling in the middle.<br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3062707</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Frozen]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3012671</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure whether people believe in evil or not, but saw this play at south street. The claim was that evil is actually a sickness related to underdevelopment for the pre-frontal cortex. The pre-frontal cortex performs executive function tasks. One aspect of this is inhibitory control which can be impeded if the cortex is underdeveloped. <br><br>Not sure what others view of evil is. I have always seen it as sickness. I reckon Jesus did too. <br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3012671</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:50:13 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Devil will tell you.........]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2798298</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>Another&nbsp;Brian Mclaren&nbsp;book has stimulated this question. <BR>Shakespeare hinted in the play Othello, that perhaps, rather than a literal being, the devil could be a metaphor for evil in our hearts, e.g jealousy.</P><P>Mclaren&nbsp;in The Secret Message of Jesus, suggested that demons could be a metaphor for corporate evil, such as the Nazi empire, or money grabbing multi-nationals. Henri Tajfel did much research on social identity theory, arguing that hostility for other groups can arise simply out of loyalty to the 'in group.' <BR><BR>So what are peoples views? Is the Devil a real, literal being or a metaphor for man kinds choice to walk his own path?<BR><BR><BR></P> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21268">Your Views</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2798298</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Equus]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2734106</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>Written by Peter Schaffer in 1973, attracting massive publicity during its recent west end run, largely because it featured Harry Potter's Daniel Radcliffe in the buff. <BR>The play was inspired by a word of mouth, rather vague account of a 17 year old boy mutilating horses in a small village near London.&nbsp;On this smallest scrap of truth, the play Equus was built.<BR>I particularly enjoyed Equus because it asked 2 questions, one that has puzzled me for over 20 years and one that has interested me , the more i have read about psychoanalysis.<BR><BR>1. Simon Callow, playing psychiatrist Martin Dysart, expressed his jealousy of Alan Strang and his relationship with his horses, claiming, 'I have never experienced worship like that.'<BR>Not that I, nor i expect Schaffer himself, believe that true worship intrinsically involves horses. But how much does it have to do with the evangelical obsession with working everyone into a frenzy readying them for the latest subliminal message about how God wishes them to tow the party line and not make a fuss. (excuse my cynicism)<BR>For all of us who consider ourselves to be worshipers of God, do any of us understand what worship is?</P><br>2. Dysart agonized that while marking Strang 'normal,' he would remove large chunks of his identity, making him essentially numb to anything the world offered. <br>Considering that Freud the father of psychoanalysis was very anti the concept of an all knowing Deity and that psychoanalysis is very prescriptive. Where is the sense of what&nbsp;are right/normal behaviours/feelings rooted in?<br><br>Answers on a postcard please. <BR><BR><br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2734106</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Soul]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2687577</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not expecting a great deal of response as i realise the board is a bit of a ghost town, but........<BR><BR>I was talking to a friend on how we define the soul and what we think it is.<BR>Do you think the soul is indenpendent of brain, mind and emmotion, just floating around in an empty vessel?<BR><BR>or<BR><BR>Is the soul something that is constanty developing and fed by conciousnes, emmotion and mind?<BR><BR>The more i think of this, the more i see it as a crucial issue, imforming our ministry practice. Do we need to as church, look after physical body and mind? Or is it enough to feed the 'soul' at the expense of all else?<BR><BR>Any other pearls of wisdom, please post.<BR><BR>seriously please post!<BR><BR> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21268">Your Views</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2687577</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[chat room]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2632026</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey! how long has there been a chat room on this site?<br><br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=21421">Off Topic</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2632026</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Robocop 2 (i think)]]></title>
		<link>http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2484143</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Preamble</b><br><b></b>&nbsp;<br>I am currently reading 'The Great Divorce' by C.S . Lewis again. His logical thinking is something that resonates a profound to me and other Christians. Although while reading it there is a sense of&nbsp; despair, the attitudes of the ghosts in the story, i feel, are too close to real life. As compelling as i find Lewis's words, i wonder if in real life, non believers aren't as stubborn as the characters in the book. <br>Did Lewis's writings change hearts, or did he just boost the faith of people such as myself?<br><br><br>Anyhows, onto robocop. It seems through my study of psychology, the holy grail in the world of understanding life, is total reductionism to biological function and adaptive advantage.<br>The fact that we must no longer see people as divine, precious beings, means that we have to reduce life to a bunch of uninspiring 'targets.' <br>I find that, especially working with young people with some kind of learning disability, we bind them up with so many rules to help them fit in, we put the most legalistic church to shame.<br>For those familiar with Robocop, you will be familiar with the 3 directives he live by; serve the public trust; protect the innocent;uphold the law. O f course this mirrors the 2 directives Christians have been given; love God; love your neighbor. <br>In Robocop 2, the robot is reprogrammed with hundreds of directives. Unable to cope with all of these rules, 'he' electrocutes himself. When he reboots, he only has his 3 directives and is able to function again.<br>The point of this? Well, I think we need to look at our emphasis when it comes to being 'salt and light.' How often will we change hearts in intellectual debate? To what extent will we foster love for God through challenging faith and exulting others be livers to live by our world view?<br>Is it enough to really live the 2 Jesus directives and leave the rest to their own introspection?<br> <p>Forum: <a href="http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/?forum=30112">Hear the Word of the Lord</a>
]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eutychus.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2484143</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
